Is Bitcoin Warfare? With Jason Lowery
Is Bitcoin Warfare? With Jason Lowery
What Bitcoin Did with Peter McCormack

“We had irrigated land, we had army. We had goods travelling across the sea, we had navy. We had goods travelling across the air, we had air force… So what happens when civilization expands its footprint into cyberspace? How do we secure zero trust permissionless access to our data in cyberspace?”
— Jason Lowery

Jason Lowery is a Major in the US Space Force and the author of Softwar: A Novel Theory on Power Projection and the National Strategic Significance of Bitcoin. In this interview, we discuss how he is building the case within the US Department of Defence that Bitcoin represents a new form of digital warfare that the US government needs to embrace to secure its power projection in cyberspace.

- - - - 

Jason Lowery burst onto the Bitcoin scene in August 2021. When a senior member of the US Space Force enters the Bitcoin debate, it tends to turn heads! But, it was his novel projections of what value Bitcoin presents to society that generated interest and controversy. Bitcoiners have long espoused Bitcoin as a peaceful revolution. Jason thinks Bitcoin can be used as a tool of warfare. 

In Softwar, Jason’s recently released book on the national strategic significance of Bitcoin, he explains the background of modern warfare, tracing its roots back to the struggle for survival in all forms of life. From single-cell organisms upwards, all of life is involved in a fight for control over resources and territory. Competition has resulted in an ecological arms race manifested through evolutionary cycles of improvements in physical power and the projection of that power.
Softwar explains that humans are just another life form involved in this competition for survival.  Humans, however, have become increasingly efficient at power projection techniques, from wielding fire to using nuclear weapons. Now, as we accelerate through the digital age, humans need to develop and harness new and innovative methods to maintain their advantages over adversaries. 

In his role within Space Force, which is developing the means to project power beyond our planet, Jason has been contemplating what other tools will be required as another arena for the competition opens up: cyberspace. Jason argues that Bitcoin has the potential to be a revolutionary cybersecurity system. Proof of Work is an innovation that moves the fight to the enemy, imposing a cost on those wishing to undertake an attack. 

Softwar is a call to action for the US Department of Defence to adopt Bitcoin as a tool of warfare in the new cyberspace battlefield. Whilst designed to secure money, PoW can, in theory, be used to secure other forms of data. Whether you agree with this assertion or not, Jason is making progress within the DoD in arguing Bitcoin’s utility makes it too important for the Department of Treasury and Federal Reserve jurisdiction. And who would bet against the DoD in a fight!

- - - -

This episode’s sponsors:
Iris Energy - Bitcoin Mining. Done Sustainably
Ledn - Financial services for Bitcoin hodlers
Bitcasino - The Future of Gaming is here
Ledger - State of the art Bitcoin hardware wallet
Wasabi Wallet - Privacy by default
Unchained - Secure your bitcoin with confidence

-----

WBD660 - Show Notes

-----

If you enjoy The What Bitcoin Did Podcast you can help support the show by doing the following:

Become a Patron and get access to shows early or help contribute

Make a tip:
Bitcoin: 3FiC6w7eb3dkcaNHMAnj39ANTAkv8Ufi2S
QR Codes: Bitcoin
If you do send a tip then please email me so that I can say thank you

Subscribe on iTunes | Spotify | Stitcher | SoundCloud | YouTube | Deezer | TuneIn | RSS Feed

Leave a review on iTunes

Share the show and episodes with your friends and family

Subscribe to the newsletter on my website

Follow me on Twitter Personal | Twitter Podcast | Instagram | Medium | YouTube

If you are interested in sponsoring the show, you can read more about that here or please feel free to drop me an email to discuss options.

@lonestarr
50,000 sats
19 May
Jason has so much depth of understanding. He is here to educate
@lonestarr
50,000 sats
19 May
Great show! Jason thank you!
@captaincrunch
1,000 sats
20 May
The US gov believes they must be able to attack everyone in the world at once. If you describe Bitcoin as warfare, then the gov’s necessary reaction will be to use other forms of warfare against it. if the gov’s purpose is to make the American society as strong as possible, it would push guns, encryption, and Bitcoin to all its citizens. Strenth in decentralization. But the gov’s real goal is to keep a thumb on its citizens, so it outlaws guns, encryption, and eventually Bitcoin.
@viapek
808 sats
20 May
Petes problems with metaphors :)
@doomdumaszm
521 sats
22 May
I agree with Jason since the begining.. I've hard time understanding those who disagree with his thesis..
@cojer
500 sats
22 May
This spook should be taken seriously. Everyone should be aware this IS the way the American Empire views anything. The phrase "When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail" is an incomplete and misleading metaphor. As a young man I worked as a framer, and I can tell you by experience, for those whose livelihood depends upon hitting nails, anything can be a hammer. No matter how decentralizing, cooperative, or trust less a tool/system is they'll find a way to hit someone with it.
@user6400839153674346
100 sats
19 May
peter kinda bein a dickhead on this one
@northtahodl
22 May
or lunkhead. I usually appreciate Peters of approach of “acting” like a dumdum, but holy cow
@agichoote
21 May
just a litlle bit xD yes peeeeeeter warfare does not imply agression and you can't cancel the cybersecurity properties of Bitcoin just because you prefer to see it as a "peaceful solution" Loved the episode !!
@f33nix
100 sats
22 May
Bitcoin is warfare, without violence.
@captaincrunch
100 sats
20 May
Cyber space is very different than physical space because it is infinite. So a wall can’t “constrain” anyone because there’s always more space for them to go.
@micky1215
100 sats
20 May
Interesting perspective, and definitely something to it.
@satoshisan
100 sats
20 May
Thank you Peter for your openness and Jason for the service for humanity! Nice ending 👦
@btcboss5
100 sats
20 May
great interview
@user5979002567021508
100 sats
20 May
I feel like every time Jason starts to flow and build some momentum with his ideas Peter interjects in a disruptive and contrarian manner. Seemed like he went into the discussion with an agenda or point to prove.
@agichoote
21 May
well, Peter is just slow to wrap his head around technical facts, Danny could be faster tho ; ) good that Bitcoin will maintain its proprerties independant of opinions ;) just for the record, this very app is requiring to spend sats to engage so don't be surprised that you only get constructive criticism and not hate around here !